peer reviewedThe authors regret that a mistake occurred in the abstract of the article. In the following sentence: "Monolithic zirconia FPDs are promising but the failure rate of single-unit restorations was not as high as expected in this sample including patients with bruxism clinical signs", “failure” needs to be replaced by “success”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reasons for failure of amalgam restorations in a teaching h...
The authors regret Matthew Smallbones was not included in the original authorship. The article's cor...
In the article entitled "Efficacy of radiographic density values of the first and second cervical ve...
In the article titled "A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instrument...
The original article [1] contains a major error carried across the captions of Tables 1, 2, and 3. I...
This Article contains numerical errors in Table 2, whereby some p-values are incorrectly published a...
The authors regret that “rheumatoid arthritis; cancer; or diabetes” were listed as examples of compo...
In the publication of this article (1) there is an error in the Methods section.https://deepblue.lib...
The authors regret that Dr V. Galimberti's affiliation was not written in full in the original versi...
The authors regret there was an error in the figures reported in the methodology flow chart for heal...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. Although the correct statisti...
The authors regret the molar unit is incorrectly displayed on the x-axis in Fig. 4A and 4C and on th...
The authors would like to inform readers of the following corrections to the article: 1 Update to au...
In the original article titled "Root canal treatment from patients’ perspective: knowledge, aware...
The figure 2 of the original version of this article was incorrect. Correct figure is presented belo...
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reasons for failure of amalgam restorations in a teaching h...
The authors regret Matthew Smallbones was not included in the original authorship. The article's cor...
In the article entitled "Efficacy of radiographic density values of the first and second cervical ve...
In the article titled "A Comparison between Piezoelectric Devices and Conventional Rotary Instrument...
The original article [1] contains a major error carried across the captions of Tables 1, 2, and 3. I...
This Article contains numerical errors in Table 2, whereby some p-values are incorrectly published a...
The authors regret that “rheumatoid arthritis; cancer; or diabetes” were listed as examples of compo...
In the publication of this article (1) there is an error in the Methods section.https://deepblue.lib...
The authors regret that Dr V. Galimberti's affiliation was not written in full in the original versi...
The authors regret there was an error in the figures reported in the methodology flow chart for heal...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. Although the correct statisti...
The authors regret the molar unit is incorrectly displayed on the x-axis in Fig. 4A and 4C and on th...
The authors would like to inform readers of the following corrections to the article: 1 Update to au...
In the original article titled "Root canal treatment from patients’ perspective: knowledge, aware...
The figure 2 of the original version of this article was incorrect. Correct figure is presented belo...
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reasons for failure of amalgam restorations in a teaching h...
The authors regret Matthew Smallbones was not included in the original authorship. The article's cor...
In the article entitled "Efficacy of radiographic density values of the first and second cervical ve...